Jump to content

Talk:Jason de Vos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jason de Vos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jason de Vos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jason de Vos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He was named to the team

[edit]

@Walter Görlitz: I made what I thought was an improvement to the wording but you reverted it, saying "He was named to the team, not in the team". What does that mean? I assume it's American English but what does it signify? The reference seems to be saying that he was named in an All-Time Canada XI selected by fans. Please explain the distinction.Deb (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's Canadian English, which in this case appears to have some similarity to American English. It signifies that the preposition is that he was name to the list that represents the team. In Canadian English, being named in the team does not make sense. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What does it mean then? In English English, you don't name someone to something; it's not a possible usage. Being named in a team, even though it's a virtual team, is. Deb (talk) 19:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Walter Görlitz:Suggestion: What if I put "He was included in the team selected by ... etc" Deb (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Even more awkward. He was included on the team [list]. WP:LANGVAR and all. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find a single example of "named to" anywhere and you haven't explained in what way being a member of a team is not the same as being "named in" the team, so I propose: "He was included in an All-Time Canada XI." Deb (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Which preposition is used in https://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/candace-chapman-tomasz-radzinski-named-to-canada-soccer-hall-of-fame-1.4646732 ?
Specifically about de Vos, "deVos was a member of the 2000 CONCACAF Gold Cup winning squad and was named to the Canada Soccer All-Time Canada XI in 2012". Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's interesting. I would still like to change it to make it clearer to English speakers all around the world. Deb (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]